Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Bennett's inequality, an upper bound on the probability that the sum of independent random variables deviates from its expected value by more than any specified amount Bhatia–Davis inequality , an upper bound on the variance of any bounded probability distribution
For instance, to solve the inequality 4x < 2x + 1 ≤ 3x + 2, it is not possible to isolate x in any one part of the inequality through addition or subtraction. Instead, the inequalities must be solved independently, yielding x < 1 / 2 and x ≥ −1 respectively, which can be combined into the final solution −1 ≤ x < 1 / 2 .
There is no corresponding upper bound as any of the 3 fractions in the inequality can be made arbitrarily large. It is the three-variable case of the rather more difficult Shapiro inequality, and was published at least 50 years earlier.
Following Antman (1983, p. 283), the definition of a variational inequality is the following one.. Given a Banach space, a subset of , and a functional : from to the dual space of the space , the variational inequality problem is the problem of solving for the variable belonging to the following inequality:
Many important inequalities can be proved by the rearrangement inequality, such as the arithmetic mean – geometric mean inequality, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, and Chebyshev's sum inequality. As a simple example, consider real numbers : By applying with := for all =, …,, it follows that + + + + + + for every permutation of , …,.
A great many important inequalities in information theory are actually lower bounds for the Kullback–Leibler divergence.Even the Shannon-type inequalities can be considered part of this category, since the interaction information can be expressed as the Kullback–Leibler divergence of the joint distribution with respect to the product of the marginals, and thus these inequalities can be ...
Consider the sum = = = (). The two sequences are non-increasing, therefore a j − a k and b j − b k have the same sign for any j, k.Hence S ≥ 0.. Opening the brackets, we deduce:
A simple example of an interpolation inequality — one in which all the u k are the same u, but the norms ‖·‖ k are different — is Ladyzhenskaya's inequality for functions :, which states that whenever u is a compactly supported function such that both u and its gradient ∇u are square integrable, it follows that the fourth power of u is integrable and [2]