Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, is the longest amendment in the U.S. Constitution. Ratified means that it was officially approved and signed into law. The most important part ...
The 14th amendment is one of the reconstruction amendments, passed after the civil war to try to clean up the mess and get the new way to work. It was originally aimed at Confederate soldiers and officeholders. Those people were never convicted of a crime, but were nevertheless barred from holding office.
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is stated as the cause for the suit, but the actual question in the petition is purely about standing under Article III. Aside from the extreme rarity of the Supreme Court accepting a petition in advance of an appeals court ruling, this might not be the case that the court would want to issue such a broad ...
Section 4 allows the US federal government to accumulate debt, and Section 5 allows Congress to make laws that enforce the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment was one of three major amendments ...
The 14th Amendment, adopted July 9, 1868, tried to address many of the questions that remained following the end of the Civil War. Section 3 is one way that former Confederates were addressed. Answer and Explanation:
A place to discuss developments in the law and the legal profession. GOP violating 14th Amendment Section 3 giving aid to insurrectionists. That doesn’t look like 2/3rds of Congress. It appears to be little more than an obvious political ploy to repair the reputation of a career criminal traitor.
Pelosi is essentially saying that Congress intends to make him ineligible for future office by the 3rd section of the 14th amendment. Emphasis added: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who ...
I think the lower court ruling is him being found guilty of insurrection or whatever they are going with. a determination regarding an individual’s disqualification from running for the presidency under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is a matter for the court, and it doesn’t involve a jury trial.
Question about Article 3 of the 14th Amendment. To paraphrase the article "anyone who engages in, gives comfort or support to an insurrection is disqualified from" various offices. That being said has any court ever determined who, if anyone, decides the level of engagement, or aid to an insurrection that needs to be met before disqualification ...
Gerdan. The answer would be judicial review: Although no justice mentioned this response, nobody should doubt that a state court’s determination of a federal constitutional question—such as Colorado’s that the former president had “engaged in an insurrection or rebellion” against the U.S. Constitution—is subject to review by the ...