Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The case was heard 20 March 1866 before Lord Penzance, and established the common law definition of marriage. [1] The case clearly spelled out the characteristics of marriage, such as a voluntary union involving one woman and one man for life and 'to the exclusion of all others'.
Analysed by British social anthropologist Alfred Radcliffe-Brown in 1940, [2] it describes a kind of ritualised banter that takes place, for example between a man and his maternal mother-in-law in some South African indigenous societies.
The Act's congressional sponsors stated, "[T]he bill amends the U.S. Code to make explicit what has been understood under federal law for over 200 years; that a marriage is the legal union of a man and a woman as husband and wife, and a spouse is a husband or wife of the opposite sex." [16]
Gov. Kim Reynolds' new attempt to enforce conservative values in Iowa, introducing a bill that would define the words “sex,” “man” and “woman” in state law, has raised the hackles of ...
Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect. [48] Ohio: 2004: 62% [25] State Issue 1 [49] Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state.
Halpern v Canada (AG), [2003] O.J. No. 2268 is a June 10, 2003 decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in which the Court found that the common law definition of marriage, which defined marriage as between one man and one woman, violated section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect. North Dakota Century Code - Title 14 Domestic Relations and Persons ; Section 14-03-01. What constitutes marriage - Spouse defined.
The Order was the largest financial supporter of the successful effort to maintain a legal definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman. [80] Rally for Yes on Prop 8 in Fresno. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints [81] [82] [83] (LDS Church) also publicly supported the proposition.