Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
and the number of partitions of n in which all parts are 1, 2 or 3 (or, equivalently, the number of partitions of n into at most three parts) is the nearest integer to (n + 3) 2 / 12. [ 14 ] Partitions in a rectangle and Gaussian binomial coefficients
The function q(n) gives the number of these strict partitions of the given sum n. For example, q(3) = 2 because the partitions 3 and 1 + 2 are strict, while the third partition 1 + 1 + 1 of 3 has repeated parts. The number q(n) is also equal to the number of partitions of n in which only odd summands are permitted. [20]
The total number of partitions of an n-element set is the Bell number B n. The first several Bell numbers are B 0 = 1, B 1 = 1, B 2 = 2, B 3 = 5, B 4 = 15, B 5 = 52, and B 6 = 203 (sequence A000110 in the OEIS ).
partition of a graph, partition of an integer, partition of an interval, partition of unity, partition of a matrix; see block matrix, and; partition of the sum of squares in statistics problems, especially in the analysis of variance, quotition and partition, two ways of viewing the operation of division of integers.
In particular, the nth moment of the Poisson distribution with expected value 1 is precisely the number of partitions of a set of size n, i.e., it is the nth Bell number (this fact is Dobiński's formula).
Thus, in the equation relating the Bell numbers to the Stirling numbers, each partition counted on the left hand side of the equation is counted in exactly one of the terms of the sum on the right hand side, the one for which k is the number of sets in the partition. [8] Spivey 2008 has given a formula that combines both of these summations:
In number theory, Glaisher's theorem is an identity useful to the study of integer partitions.Proved in 1883 [1] by James Whitbread Lee Glaisher, it states that the number of partitions of an integer into parts not divisible by is equal to the number of partitions in which no part is repeated or more times.
However, the coefficient of x 12 is −1 because there are seven ways to partition 12 into an even number of distinct parts, but there are eight ways to partition 12 into an odd number of distinct parts, and 7 − 8 = −1. This interpretation leads to a proof of the identity by canceling pairs of matched terms (involution method). [1]