enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Texas (2023) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Texas_(2023)

    The act was widely expected to reduce the number of deportations by the agency. Texas filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas soon after, and Judge Drew B. Tipton issued a temporary restraining order. The state soon dismissed the lawsuit, but filed a new suit with Louisiana in April 2021 after the ...

  3. Niz-Chavez v. Garland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niz-Chavez_v._Garland

    Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 593 U.S. 155 (2021), was an immigration decision by the United States Supreme Court.In a 6–3 decision authored by Neil Gorsuch, the Court ruled against the federal government, holding that deportation hearing notices need to be in a single document.

  4. United States v. Texas (2016) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Texas_(2016)

    Texas, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) program. In a one-line per curiam decision , an equally divided Court affirmed the lower-court injunction blocking the President Barack Obama 's program.

  5. Ukrainian refugees without UK family members applying for visas under the new sponsorship scheme have been told not to travel to Britain until they have received a decision on their application.

  6. Supreme Court unanimous ruling may pave way for mass deportation

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-unanimous-ruling-may...

    The couple appealed and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, which in a 9-0 vote affirmed both lower court rulings.

  7. DeVillier v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devillier_v._Texas

    Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence . Because the case touched on whether or not the 5th Amendment is self-executing, the case had implications for Trump v.

  8. Rothgery v. Gillespie County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County

    Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a criminal defendant's initial appearance before a magistrate judge, where he learns the charge against him and his liberty is subject to restriction, marks the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings that trigger attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. [1]

  9. Texas man hopes to reunite with family after they were ...

    www.aol.com/texas-man-hopes-reunite-family...

    A Texas man is fighting to get his wife and four children back after he says they were unexpectedly deported to Mexico. Federico Arellano is a U.S. citizen, and says three of his four kids are too