Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Shapiro–Wilk test tests the null hypothesis that a sample x 1, ..., x n came from a normally distributed population. The test statistic is = (= ()) = (¯), where with parentheses enclosing the subscript index i is the ith order statistic, i.e., the ith-smallest number in the sample (not to be confused with ).
Kolmogorov–Smirnov test: this test only works if the mean and the variance of the normal distribution are assumed known under the null hypothesis, Lilliefors test: based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, adjusted for when also estimating the mean and variance from the data, Shapiro–Wilk test, and; Pearson's chi-squared test.
In assessing whether a given distribution is suited to a data-set, the following tests and their underlying measures of fit can be used: Bayesian information criterion; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test; Cramér–von Mises criterion; Anderson–Darling test; Berk-Jones tests [1] [2] Shapiro–Wilk test; Chi-squared test; Akaike information criterion ...
The Shapiro–Francia test is a statistical test for the normality of a population, based on sample data. It was introduced by S. S. Shapiro and R. S. Francia in 1972 as a simplification of the Shapiro–Wilk test .
It should only contain pages that are Normality tests or lists of Normality tests, ... Shapiro–Francia test; Shapiro–Wilk test This page was ...
The likelihood-ratio test, also known as Wilks test, [2] is the oldest of the three classical approaches to hypothesis testing, together with the Lagrange multiplier test and the Wald test. [3] In fact, the latter two can be conceptualized as approximations to the likelihood-ratio test, and are asymptotically equivalent.
Empirical testing has found [5] that the Anderson–Darling test is not quite as good as the Shapiro–Wilk test, but is better than other tests. Stephens [1] found to be one of the best empirical distribution function statistics for detecting most departures from normality.
A normal quantile plot for a simulated set of test statistics that have been standardized to be Z-scores under the null hypothesis. The departure of the upper tail of the distribution from the expected trend along the diagonal is due to the presence of substantially more large test statistic values than would be expected if all null hypotheses were true.