Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In criminal law, mens rea (/ ˈ m ɛ n z ˈ r eɪ ə /; Law Latin for "guilty mind" [1]) is the mental state of a defendant who is accused of committing a crime. In common law jurisdictions, most crimes require proof both of mens rea and actus reus ("guilty act") before the defendant can be found guilty.
Mens rea refers to the crime's mental elements of the defendant's intent. This is a necessary element—that is, the criminal act must be voluntary or purposeful. Mens rea is the mental intention (mental fault), or the defendant's state of mind at the time of the offense, sometimes called the guilty mind. It stems from the ancient maxim of ...
The terms actus reus and mens rea developed in English Law are derived from a principle stated by Edward Coke, namely, actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, [1] which means: "an act does not make a person guilty unless (their) mind is also guilty"; hence, the general test of guilt is one that requires proof of fault, culpability or ...
A motive is the cause that moves people to induce a certain action. [1] In criminal law, motive in itself is not an element of any given crime; however, the legal system typically allows motive to be proven to make plausible the accused's reasons for committing a crime, at least when those motives may be obscure or hard to identify with.
Concurrence occurs when an act reflects mens rea and actus reus. For example, X goes on a hill overlooking the field that Y is playing on, intentionally dislodges a large boulder, and directs it towards Y intending to kill Y. If it kills Y, concurrence is established.
The crown must show that the accused performed an unlawful act that was objectively dangerous. That is, a reasonable person would foresee the risk of harm. (R. v. DeSousa) Establish mens rea of predicate offence. Establish foresight of risk of death. Must show that a reasonable person in the circumstances and possessing the characteristics of ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
The authority for the actus reus and mens rea of involuntary manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act is the High Court of Australia case of Wilson v R. [31] This case determined that the act that caused the death must breach the criminal law and that the act must carry an appreciable risk of serious injury ( actus reus ).