Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the First Amendment rights of candidates for judicial office. In a 5–4 decision, the court ruled that Minnesota's announce clause, which forbade candidates for judicial office from announcing their views on disputed ...
Case Citation Issues Joined by ... Republican Party of Minnesota v. White: 536 U.S. 765 (2002) First Amendment Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas: References
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (2002), Bopp argued on behalf of the challengers to a Minnesota rule of judicial conduct barring candidates for judicial office from expressing their views on disputed legal and political issues; the U.S. Supreme Court agreed, 5–4, that the rule was unconstitutional. [50] [51] In McConnell v.
In December, Republican Party of Minnesota Chair David Hann submitted a list of candidate names to Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon to be added to the party's presidential primary ballot ...
Near v. Minnesota; R. Republican Party of Minnesota v. White; S. Smiley v. Holm This page was last edited on 21 February 2012, at 22:09 (UTC). Text is available under ...
Patterson v. Texas: 536 U.S. 984 (2002) death penalty Breyer: Ginsburg dissented from the Court's denial of a stay of the execution of an individual who was 17 when he committed the capital offense, believing the Court should revisit the issue of whether it was constitutional to impose the death penalty for crimes committed when the offender was a minor.
Get breaking news and the latest headlines on business, entertainment, politics, world news, tech, sports, videos and much more from AOL
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!