Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Apple–FBI encryption dispute concerns whether and to what extent courts in the United States can compel manufacturers to assist in unlocking cell phones whose data are cryptographically protected. [1] There is much debate over public access to strong encryption. [2]
During that dispute, the FBI asked Apple to create a backdoor that would allow the iPhone's passcode to be bruteforced. [28] Baker had long supported legislation requiring encryption systems to include a means to allow access by law enforcement with a proper warrant, as a way to address a phenomenon law enforcement officers call "going dark". [27]
Apple challenged the order. In the end the FBI hired a third party to crack the phone. See FBI–Apple encryption dispute. In April 2016, Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr sponsored a bill, described as "overly vague" by some, [44] that would be likely to criminalise all forms of strong encryption. [45] [46]
The FBI is encouraging people to start texting and calling over end-to-end encryption apps in the wake of one of the largest cyberattacks in U.S. history, according to reports from NBC News and ...
CALEA systems can include classified court orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which processes some U.S. intelligence court orders. The FBI official declined to say whether ...
The FBI and a leading federal cybersecurity agency are warning Android and iPhone users to stop sending unencrypted texts to users of the other operating system after the Salt Typhoon hack of ...
The 2016 FBI–Apple encryption dispute concerns the ability of courts in the United States to compel manufacturers' assistance in unlocking cell phones whose contents are cryptographically protected. [citation needed] [further explanation needed]
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us