enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Steagald v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steagald_v._United_States

    Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 (1981), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that, based on the Fourth Amendment, a police officer may not conduct a warrantless search of a third party's home in an attempt to apprehend the subject of an arrest warrant, absent consent or exigent circumstances.

  3. Payton v. New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payton_v._New_York

    Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning warrantless entry into a private home in order to make a felony arrest.The Court struck down a New York statute providing for such warrantless entries because the Fourth Amendment draws a firm line at the entrance to the house.

  4. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Bill of Rights in the National Archives. The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights.It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets requirements for issuing warrants: warrants must be issued by a judge or magistrate, justified by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and must particularly describe the place to be ...

  5. Arrest warrant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrest_warrant

    An arrest warrant is an "outstanding arrest warrant" when the person named in the warrant has not yet been arrested. A warrant may be outstanding if the person named in the warrant is intentionally evading law enforcement , unaware that there is a warrant out for their arrest, the agency responsible for executing the warrant has a backlog of ...

  6. Maryland v. Buie - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland_v._Buie

    Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States handed down in 1990. In the case, the Court held that the Fourth Amendment permits a properly limited protective sweep in conjunction with an in-home arrest when the searching officer possesses a reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts that the area to be swept harbors an ...

  7. Opinion - The ICC’s Israel arrest warrants have backfired - AOL

    www.aol.com/opinion-icc-israel-arrest-warrants...

    Only one Hamas leader, Mohammed Deif, has been charged with the massacre and hostage-taking of Oct. 7, and he is most likely dead. As a result, the court is facing a head-on collision with the ...

  8. Attorney who spat at teen BLM protester gets $760K for cops ...

    www.aol.com/attorney-spat-teen-blm-protester...

    A Wisconsin lawyer who spat at a teen Black Lives Matter protest leader has been awarded $760,000 because cops wrongly burst into her home with guns drawn to arrest her without a warrant.

  9. ICC warrants are binding, EU cannot pick and choose, EU's ...

    www.aol.com/news/icc-warrants-binding-eu-cannot...

    European Union governments cannot pick and choose whether to execute arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court against two Israeli leaders and a Hamas commander, the EU's foreign ...