Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
On this page, environmental lawsuit means "a lawsuit where the well-being of an environmental asset or the well-being of a set of environmental assets is in dispute". Also on this page, lawsuit with environmental relevance means "a lawsuit where a non-environmental entity or a set of non-environmental entities is in dispute, but whose outcome has relevance for an environmental asset or for a ...
Later, the manager responsible for retaliation against Jayko lost his bid to become Director Enforcement for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in large part due to the finding by the judge in the Jayko case that the head of the Ohio's EPA personally retaliated against Mr. Jayko. [11] 2000 Marsha Coleman-Adebayo
In 2019, the EPA fined the company $31,000 for hazardous waste violations and required it to pay $55,000 to the Fremont Fire Department for emergency response equipment. At least four fires have ...
The New Mexico Environment Department and Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department announced a combined fine of $42 million against Ameredev Operating in July 2023, citing violations of ...
Also in 2009, INVISTA agreed to pay a $1.7 million civil penalty and spend up to $500 million to correct self-reported environmental violations at its facilities in seven states. [8] [9] Prior to the settlement, the company had disclosed to the EPA more than 680 violations after auditing 12 facilities acquired from DuPont in 2004.
Violations were observed during EPA inspections in Overland Park and Kansas City, the federal agency said. Kansas City marijuana company fined more than $120,000 by EPA. Here’s the rule it violated
Sep. 9—The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today announced a settlement resulting in a fine of $82, 613 with Hawaiian Ice Company over violations of the Clean Air Act. Specifically, EPA ...
American Electric Power Company v. Connecticut, 564 U.S. 410 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, in an 8–0 decision, held that corporations cannot be sued for greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) under federal common law, primarily because the Clean Air Act (CAA) delegates the management of carbon dioxide and other GHG emissions to the Environmental Protection ...