enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Alvarez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Alvarez

    United States v. Alvarez , 567 U.S. 709 (2012), is a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was unconstitutional. The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was a federal law that criminalized false statements about having a military medal.

  3. United States v. Alvarez-Machain - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Alvarez...

    United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the respondent's forcible abduction from a foreign country, despite the existence of an extradition treaty with said country, does not prohibit him from being tried before a U.S. court for violations of American criminal laws.

  4. Oyez Project - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oyez_Project

    The Oyez Project is an unofficial online multimedia archive website for the Supreme Court of the United States. It was initiated by the Illinois Institute of Technology's Chicago-Kent College of Law and now also sponsored by Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute and Justia. The website has emphasis on the court's audio of oral arguments.

  5. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richmond_Newspapers,_Inc...

    Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980), is a United States Supreme Court case involving issues of privacy in correspondence with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, the freedom of the press, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  6. Almendarez-Torres v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almendarez-Torres_v...

    Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court written by Justice Stephen Breyer which confirmed that a sentencing enhancement for a prior felony conviction was not subject to the Sixth Amendment requirement for a jury to determine the fact beyond a reasonable doubt.

  7. Smith v. United States (2013) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._United_States_(2013)

    Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 (2013), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. [1] The case was argued on November 6, 2012, and decided on January 9, 2013. [2] Roberts Court

  8. Henderson v. United States (2013) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henderson_v._United_States...

    Armarcion D. Henderson v. United States: Docket no. 11-9307: ... was not clear under current law at the time of trial. The court of appeals denied a petition for ...

  9. United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Glaxo...

    United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd., 410 U.S. 52 (1973), [1] is a 1973 decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that (1) when a patent is directly involved in an antitrust violation, the Government may challenge the validity of the patent; [2] and (2) ordinarily, in patent-antitrust cases, "[m]andatory selling on specified terms and compulsory patent licensing at ...