Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
If a company carries the PETA "animal test-free" or "cruelty-free" label, it must also have signed agreements with its suppliers that they do not use animal testing. [149] PETA also awards a "vegan" label to clothing and furniture products (instead of entire companies), which means that the products are free from animal-derived ingredients, but ...
PETA spokespersons stated that the Born Free USA Primate Sanctuary in Texas has contacted Alpha Genesis, offering to work with it to provide the animals with a "suitable home," and PETA says it ...
In a blog post this week, PETA claimed that researchers from China's Research Institute for Traffic Medicine and Daping Hospital strapped live pigs to a metal sled for eight hours, screwed a metal ...
Unnecessary Fuss is a film produced by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), showing footage shot inside the University of Pennsylvania's Head Injury Clinic in Philadelphia. The raw footage was recorded by the laboratory researchers as they inflicted brain damage to baboons using a hydraulic device.
A spokesperson for the UK-based Understanding Animal Research organisation was sceptical about the scientists’ claims, saying: “Those who do animal testing are also the biggest investors in ...
These articles deal with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), their campaigns, founders, etc. Not for celebrity endorsers. Not for celebrity endorsers. Wikimedia Commons has media related to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals .
It's another example of PETA valuing the lives of animals over people - not to say there aren't lots of people who shouldn't be valued over animals, or that animal testing is by any means right in every situation (testing makeup and vanity things on animals drives me nuts) but when it saves lives on the scale of these examples (a cure for AIDS ...
The acronym "PETA" was a registered trademark that belonged to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Thus the trademark infringement claim centered on whether the "defendant used the mark 'in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising' of goods or services."