enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dereliction of duty in American law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dereliction_of_duty_in...

    Dereliction of duty is a specific offense under United States Code Title 10, Section 892, Article 92 and applies to all branches of the US military. A service member who is derelict has willfully refused to perform his duties (or follow a given order) or has incapacitated himself in such a way that he cannot perform his duties.

  3. Rowland v. Christian - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rowland_v._Christian

    Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal. 2d 108 (1968), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California. It eliminated the categories of invitee, licensee, and trespasser to determine the duty of care owed by a possessor of land to the people on the land. It replaced the classifications with a general duty of care.

  4. Summers v. Tice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_v._Tice

    Decided November 17, 1948; Full case name: Charles A. Summers v. Howard W. Tice, et al. Citation(s) 33 Cal.2d 80 199 P.2d 1: Holding; When a plaintiff suffers a single indivisible injury, for which the negligence of each of several potential tortfeasors could have been a but-for cause, but only one of which could have actually been the cause, all the potential tortfeasors are jointly and ...

  5. CA price-gouging laws could block fire victims from renting ...

    www.aol.com/news/ca-price-gouging-laws-could...

    (The Center Square) – Real estate experts say California’s anti-price-gouging laws could make it impossible to rent out housing to the thousands of families displaced by the ongoing wildfires ...

  6. United States tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_tort_law

    Tedla v. Ellman, 280 N.Y. 124, 19 N.E.2d 987, (1939) [3] on negligence per se, or the violation of a duty under a statute; Seong Sil Kim v. New York City Transit Authority, duty of care to a person who may have been attempting suicide.

  7. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_v._Yellow_Cab_Co.

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

  8. Premises liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premises_liability

    Christian, [1] the Supreme Court of California replaced the old classifications with a general duty of care to all persons on one's land, regardless of their status. After several highly publicized and controversial cases, the California Legislature enacted a statute in 1985 that partially restored immunity to landowners from some types of ...

  9. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us