Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Opponents of the proposition argued that it "removes ALL protections on marriage, including limits on children, close relatives, and three or more people marrying each other" as well as "[overriding] all laws on marriage [and a] 'fundamental right' to marry [meaning] it would remove protections against child marriages, incest, and polygamy" and ...
Texas case G. Lee Cook, his wife D. Cook, and desired wife J. Bronson, of Salt Lake City, Utah, filed a lawsuit in hopes to abolish restrictive laws against polygamy. [49] Court cases against anti-polygamy laws argue that such laws are unconstitutional in regulating sexual intimacy, or religious freedom. [50] In the case of Bronson v.
In an October 2004 op-ed for USA Today, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley argued that, as a simple matter of equal treatment under law, polygamy ought to be legal. Acknowledging that underage girls are sometimes coerced into polygamous marriages, Turley replied that "banning polygamy is no more a solution to child abuse ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
California now has 11% tax on gun and ammunition due to new law. Here’s what to know Assembly Bill 1013 requires California bars and nightclubs serving alcohol to offer test kits for date rape ...
Nevertheless, some Christian groups in different periods have practiced, or currently do practice, polygamy. [3] [4] Some Christians actively debate whether the New Testament or Christian ethics allows or forbids polygamy [5] [better source needed] and there are several Christian views on the Old Covenant.
“The LGBT lifestyle, we love them, but it’s a sin,” one attendee said at the Saturday Jesus March.
Polygamy was outlawed in federal territories by the Edmunds Act, and there are laws against the practice in all 50 states, as well as the District of Columbia, Guam, [19] and Puerto Rico. [20] Because state laws exist, polygamy is not actively prosecuted at the federal level, [21] but the practice is considered "against public policy".