enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Insensitivity to sample size - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insensitivity_to_sample_size

    Insensitivity to sample size is a cognitive bias that occurs when people judge the probability of obtaining a sample statistic without respect to the sample size.For example, in one study, subjects assigned the same probability to the likelihood of obtaining a mean height of above six feet [183 cm] in samples of 10, 100, and 1,000 men.

  3. Scope neglect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scope_neglect

    Scope neglect or scope insensitivity is a cognitive bias that occurs when the valuation of a problem is not valued with a multiplicative relationship to its size. Scope neglect is a specific form of extension neglect .

  4. Extension neglect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extension_neglect

    Extension neglect [a] is a type of cognitive bias which occurs when the sample size is ignored when its determination is relevant. [1] For instance, when reading an article about a scientific study, extension neglect occurs when the reader ignores the number of people involved in the study (sample size) but still makes inferences about a population based on the sample.

  5. Sample size determination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination

    Sample size determination or estimation is the act of choosing the number of observations or replicates to include in a statistical sample. The sample size is an important feature of any empirical study in which the goal is to make inferences about a population from a sample.

  6. Representativeness heuristic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representativeness_heuristic

    Representativeness heuristic is also employed when subjects estimate the probability of a specific parameter of a sample. If the parameter highly represents the population, the parameter is often given a high probability. This estimation process usually ignores the impact of the sample size.

  7. Base rate fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy

    [14] [15] It would have been incorrect, and an example of prosecutor's fallacy, to rely solely on the "1 in 400" figure to deduce that a given person matching the sample would be likely to be the culprit. Frequency tree of 100 000 battered American women showing the base rate fallacy made by the defense in the O. J. Simpson murder trial

  8. Here’s How Mayonnaise and Miracle Whip Are Different ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/mayonnaise-miracle-whip-different...

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also has its own (very specific) definition of the multi-purpose sauce. According to its guidelines, in order for a product to be labeled and sold as ...

  9. Clustering illusion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clustering_illusion

    Related biases are the illusion of control which the clustering illusion could contribute to, and insensitivity to sample size in which people don't expect greater variation in smaller samples. A different cognitive bias involving misunderstanding of chance streams is the gambler's fallacy .