Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Sortino ratio measures the risk-adjusted return of an investment asset, portfolio, or strategy. [1] It is a modification of the Sharpe ratio but penalizes only those returns falling below a user-specified target or required rate of return , while the Sharpe ratio penalizes both upside and downside volatility equally.
The upside-potential ratio is a measure of a return of an investment asset relative to the minimal acceptable return. The measurement allows a firm or individual to choose investments which have had relatively good upside performance, per unit of downside risk .
Sortino and Steven Satchell at Cambridge University co-authored the first book on PMPT. This was intended as a graduate seminar text in portfolio management. A more recent book by Sortino was written for practitioners. The first publication in a major journal was co-authored by Sortino and Dr. Robert van der Meer, then at Shell Oil Netherlands.
For example, what does it mean if one investment has a Sharpe ratio of 0.50 and another has a Sharpe ratio of −0.50? How much worse was the second portfolio than the first? These downsides apply to all risk-adjusted return measures that are ratios (e.g., Sortino ratio, Treynor ratio, upside-potential ratio, etc.).
The CAPM, however, includes both halves of a distribution in its calculation of risk. Because of this it has been argued that it is crucial to not simply rely upon the CAPM, but rather to distinguish between the downside risk, which is the risk concerning the extent of losses, and upside risk, or risk concerning the extent of gains.
The ratio is used to measure the efficiency of your company’s operations. A high ratio shows the company uses its assets well. A low ratio indicates a less than optimal use of existing assets.
Upside potential ratio; Upside risk; Downside risk; Sortino ratio; Omega ratio; ... Option pricing and calculation of their "Greeks" ... Updated Data, Excel Spreadsheets.
Jensen's alpha was first used as a measure in the evaluation of mutual fund managers by Michael Jensen in 1968. [2] The CAPM return is supposed to be 'risk adjusted', which means it takes account of the relative riskiness of the asset.