Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The notation convention chosen here (with W 0 and W −1) follows the canonical reference on the Lambert W function by Corless, Gonnet, Hare, Jeffrey and Knuth. [3]The name "product logarithm" can be understood as follows: since the inverse function of f(w) = e w is termed the logarithm, it makes sense to call the inverse "function" of the product we w the "product logarithm".
On the other hand, if a function's domain is continuous, a table can give the values of the function at specific values of the domain. If an intermediate value is needed, interpolation can be used to estimate the value of the function. For example, a portion of a table for the sine function might be given as follows, with values rounded to 6 ...
one can find the ordinary generating function for the sequence 0, 1, 4, 9, 16, ... Suppose the table has r rows and c columns; the row sums are t 1, t 2 ...
The basic way to maximize a differentiable function is to find the stationary points (the points where the derivative is zero); since the derivative of a sum is just the sum of the derivatives, but the derivative of a product requires the product rule, it is easier to compute the stationary points of the log-likelihood of independent events ...
In statistics, the Q-function is the tail distribution function of the standard normal distribution. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] In other words, Q ( x ) {\displaystyle Q(x)} is the probability that a normal (Gaussian) random variable will obtain a value larger than x {\displaystyle x} standard deviations.
An arbitrary function φ : R n → C is the characteristic function of some random variable if and only if φ is positive definite, continuous at the origin, and if φ(0) = 1. Khinchine’s criterion. A complex-valued, absolutely continuous function φ, with φ(0) = 1, is a characteristic function if and only if it admits the representation
The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.
It is unknown whether these constants are transcendental in general, but Γ( 1 / 3 ) and Γ( 1 / 4 ) were shown to be transcendental by G. V. Chudnovsky. Γ( 1 / 4 ) / 4 √ π has also long been known to be transcendental, and Yuri Nesterenko proved in 1996 that Γ( 1 / 4 ), π, and e π are algebraically independent.