Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Mega Limited released the source code to their client-side software around 28 January 2017 under an own license on github.com. [32] [33] MS-DOS 1.25 and 2.0 Microsoft: 1982 2018 Yes Yes Yes MIT: On 25 March 2014 Microsoft made the code to MS-DOS 1.25 and 2.0 available to the public under a Microsoft Research License for educational purposes.
The following table compares various features of each license and is a general guide to the terms and conditions of each license, based on seven subjects or categories. Recent tools like the European Commissions' Joinup Licensing Assistant, [ 10 ] makes possible the licenses selection and comparison based on more than 40 subjects or categories ...
GitHub: GitHub, Inc. (A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation) 2008-04 No Yes Unknown Denies service to Crimea, North Korea, Sudan, Syria [9] List of government takedown requests. GitLab: GitLab Inc. 2011-09 [10] Partial [11] Yes [12] GitLab FOSS – free software GitLab Enterprise Edition (EE) – proprietary
Some developers have adopted the AGPL, and others have switched to proprietary licenses with features of open-source licensing. [120] For example, open-core developer Elastic switched from the Apache license to the "source-available" Server Side Public License. [121] Source-available software comes with source code as a reference. [122]
The Unlicense software license, published around 2010, offers a public-domain waiver text with a fall-back public-domain-like license, inspired by permissive licenses but without an attribution clause. [12] [13] In 2015 GitHub reported that approximately 102,000 of their 5.1 million licensed projects, or 2%, use the Unlicense. [note 3]
One side of the NFL playoff picture could be close to its final form in Week 17, as the last berths in the NFC could be clinched on Sunday.
These cozy breakfast recipes, like sweet potato toast and oatmeal, take under 20 minutes to prepare for a warm and nourishing meal to start your day.
Open-source software can also be commercialized from selling services, such as training, technical support, or consulting, rather than the software itself. [5] [6]Another possibility is offering open-source software in source code form only, while providing executable binaries to paying customers only, offering the commercial service of compiling and packaging of the software.