Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Perhaps the no original research board is the wrong place to discuss this, The problem with making the lists rules more "strict" for weight can be expanded on similarly as this article does for film. They note that best-of lists, with various rules applied to them "negate the function of serious film reviewing and criticism" and that a best of ...
Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. On Wikipedia , original research means material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published source exists. [ a ] This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that reaches or implies a conclusion not stated by the sources .
The no original research and verifiability policies are of paramount importance to Wikipedia. Inline citations, which link specific reliable sources with specific pieces of information in the article, provide practical support for these policies by making it easier to check the article content.
Wikipedia:No original research/Wikipedia:Verifiability – Wikipedia is not the place to publish new, original research or find research which has not yet been recognized by credible sources; Wikipedia:Patent nonsense – At any given time, a Wikipedia article may contain nonsense.
In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that information comes from a reliable source. No original research – Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis ...
User Frankakapta is repeatedly inserting his own original research into the article on Yusuf al-Qaradawi.Despite a very extensive discussion on the talk page in which it has been repeatedly pointed out to him that Wikipedia's guidelines do not allow original research (regardless of how accurate it may be), Frankakapta has continued to insist that his original research (consisting of his own ...
[d] For example, a review article that analyzes research papers in a field is a secondary source for the research. [e] Whether a source is primary or secondary depends on context. A book by a military historian about the Second World War might be a secondary source about the war, but where it includes details of the author's own war experiences ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us