enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Taxonomy of Protista - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomy_of_Protista

    [1] [b] In the 21st century, the classification shifted toward a two-kingdom system of protists: Chromista (containing the chromalveolate, rhizarian and hacrobian groups) and Protozoa (containing excavates and all protists more closely related to animals and fungi). [2] The following groups contain protists.

  3. Kingdom (biology) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_(biology)

    The kingdom-level classification of life is still widely employed as a useful way of grouping organisms, notwithstanding some problems with this approach: Kingdoms such as Protozoa represent grades rather than clades, and so are rejected by phylogenetic classification systems.

  4. Cavalier-Smith's system of classification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavalier-Smith's_system_of...

    The initial targets of Cavalier-Smith's classification, the protozoa were classified as members of the animal kingdom, [12] and many algae were regarded as part of the plant kingdom. With growing awareness that the animals and plants embraced unrelated taxa, the use of the two kingdom system was rejected by specialists.

  5. Template:Full biological kingdom classification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Full_biological...

    This page was last edited on 22 September 2024, at 17:03 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  6. Protozoa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protozoa

    This classification remained widespread in the 19th and early 20th century, [7] and even became elevated to a variety of higher ranks, including phylum, subkingdom, kingdom, and then sometimes included within the similarly paraphyletic Protoctista or Protista.

  7. Sarcomastigophora - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcomastigophora

    It is polyphyletic, and it is not a universally recognized classification. It places great significance upon method of locomotion in generating the taxonomy. It can be described either as: kingdom Protista → phylum Sarcomastigophora. or in older classifications as phylum Protozoa → subphylum Sarcomastigophora. [3]

  8. Protist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protist

    In 1860, British naturalist John Hogg proposed Protoctista (meaning 'first-created beings') as the name for a fourth kingdom of nature (the other kingdoms being Linnaeus' plant, animal and mineral) which comprised all the lower, primitive organisms, including protophyta, protozoa and sponges, at the merging bases of the plant and animal kingdoms.

  9. Amoebozoa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amoebozoa

    [7] [9] In traditional classification schemes, Amoebozoa is usually ranked as a phylum within either the kingdom Protista [10] or the kingdom Protozoa. [11] [12] In the classification favored by the International Society of Protistologists, it is retained as an unranked "supergroup" within Eukaryota. [7]