enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Juror misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juror_misconduct

    Under the common law, jurors could be charged with contempt of court if they were found to have carried out independent research into the case they were trying. Proving that a juror was guilty of a contempt required proof that he/she had acted contrary to a judicial order (e.g. to refrain from carrying out research online).

  3. Contempt of court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_court

    Contempt of court is the only remaining common law offence in Canada. Contempt of court includes the following behaviors: Failing to maintain a respectful attitude, failing to remain silent or failing to refrain from showing approval or disapproval of the proceeding; Refusing or neglecting to obey a subpoena

  4. Juror 'misconduct' battle brewing in Trump hush-money case - AOL

    www.aol.com/juror-misconduct-battle-brewing...

    One day after Donald Trump lost his 11th-hour bid to void his hush-money conviction, a juror "misconduct" battle is brewing, according to a newly-public series of court filings in the case.

  5. Judges rule on whether NC juror should have gone to jail for ...

    www.aol.com/judges-rule-whether-nc-juror...

    A Harnett County man who refused to wear a mask in 2022 at his local courthouse is in the clear following a decision by the North Carolina Court of Appeals to reverse his contempt-of-court conviction.

  6. Judge orders uncooperative former state lawmaker to bring ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-orders-uncooperative...

    Judge John Robert Blakey told Acevedo that if he forgets to bring his glasses to court again Tuesday, he could be held in contempt. His attorney, Gabrielle Sansonetti, said she'd buy her client a ...

  7. Tanner v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanner_v._United_States

    Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that juror testimony could not be used to discredit or overturn a jury verdict, even if the jury had been consuming copious amounts of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine throughout the course of the trial.

  8. Judge in hush money trial threatens Trump with jail after ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-holds-trump-contempt...

    The judge in Donald Trump’s hush money case held the former president in criminal contempt over posts on Truth Social that he said violated a gag order barring any attacks on jurors and ...

  9. Batson v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batson_v._Kentucky

    Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling that a prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge in a criminal case—the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so—may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on their race.