enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Copyright lawsuits by Superman's creators - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_lawsuits_by...

    In April 1965, Siegel and Shuster applied to renew the copyright of Superman, and that June, National Periodical Publications filed its own renewal application. [20] National kept publishing Superman stories and licensing Superman merchandise after April 18, 1966, the date the initial 28-year term ended.

  3. Warner Bros hit with Superman copyright lawsuit ahead of new ...

    www.aol.com/warner-bros-hit-superman-copyright...

    The estate of one of Superman's co-creators has filed a copyright lawsuit in a U.S. court against Warner Bros. Discovery ahead of the release of its new movie "Superman," part of a planned reboot ...

  4. Warner Bros. Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warner_Bros._Inc._v...

    The Greatest American Hero, is the third case in a Second Circuit trilogy of 20th century copyright infringement cases in which the proprietors of Superman copyrights sued other companies for publishing fictional exploits of a cape-wearing superhero. Although the plaintiffs were successful in the first two cases, Superman v. Wonderman and ...

  5. National's Superman copyright was held valid but the McClure strip was not under copyright, and the finding that Captain Marvel was an infringement of that copyright was affirmed. [6]. Judge Hand’s ruling focused on the similarities between the stories and elements used in Captain Marvel and Superman comics, rather than explicitly separating ...

  6. When Superman and Batman Copyrights Expire in a Decade, Will ...

    www.aol.com/superman-batman-copyrights-expire...

    About a decade ago, Zack Snyder developed a storyline for the DC Extended Universe that involved Bruce Wayne impregnating Lois Lane. The subplot in which Batman cuckolds Superman was poised to ...

  7. Detective Comics, Inc. v. Bruns Publications, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detective_Comics,_Inc._v...

    A side-by-side comparison of Detective's Superman and Bruns's Wonderman strips is provided in Superman v. Wonderman, along with corresponding passages from the preceding excerpt from the Second Circuit's opinion. Detective prevailed in the district court, which found Bruns guilty of copyright infringement.

  8. Jude Law reveals the real reason why he turned down the role ...

    www.aol.com/article/2016/06/09/jude-law-reveals...

    The 43-year-old actor admitted he actually said no to playing a legendary comic book hero for the most outrageous reason.

  9. Copyright protection for fictional characters - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_protection_for...

    In India, recourse can be had to trademark law which recognises that fictional characters enjoy goodwill, and provides relief for cases of ‘character merchandising’. ’. Character merchandising has been defined as involving the exploitation of fictional characters by licensing these fictional characters in the case of Star India Private Limited vs Leo Burnett (India) Private L