Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Act criminalized the practice of polygamy, unincorporated the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), and limited the church's real estate holdings. According to an article in the Virginia Law Review , legislators did not actually believe that the bill would end polygamy.
Section 20A; Section 21 notice; Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code; Section 171 of the Criminal Code of Cyprus; Secured transactions in the United States; Sedition Act 1948; Sedition Act (Singapore) Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen; Selective Training and Service Act of 1940; Self-deportation; Seling v. Young; Sell v. United States; Senatus ...
Ala. Admin. Code — Alabama Administrative Code (unofficial text) Ala. Code — Code of Alabama 1975 (unofficial text) Alaska Admin. Code — Alaska Administrative Code (unofficial text) Alaska Stat. — Alaska Statutes (unofficial text) All ER — All England Law Reports; All SA — All South African Law Reports; A.L.R. — American Law Reports
Section 20A; Section 21 notice; Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code; Section 171 of the Criminal Code of Cyprus; Secured transactions in the United States; Sedition Act 1948; Sedition Act (Singapore) Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen; Selective Training and Service Act of 1940; Self-deportation; Seling v. Young; Sell v. United States; Senatus ...
A castle doctrine, also known as a castle law or a defense of habitation law, is a legal doctrine that designates a person's abode or any legally occupied place (for example, an automobile or a home) as a place in which that person has protections and immunities permitting one, in certain circumstances, to use force (up to and including deadly force) to defend oneself against an intruder, free ...
The charges were filed under Sections 415/417 of the Penal Code and Section 14 of ATIPSOM. [117] In a separate case, another woman was charged in the Klang Magistrates' Court with operating an unregistered care center in North Klang on 11 September 2024, under Section 5(1) of the Care Centres Act 1993. [118]
He strongly opposes the implementation of SSCP citing that implementing this scheme will be a criminal offence under section 295 Indian Penal Code. [ 187 ] [ 188 ] He wrote letters to Prime Minister of India in June 2009 asking him to stop the project [ 189 ] and had informed the Supreme Court on 14 October 2015 that the government may not ...