Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The lower the audit risk, the higher the materiality will be set. In terms of the Conceptual Framework (see "materiality in accounting" above), materiality also has a qualitative aspect. This means that, even if a misstatement is not material in "Dollar" (or other denomination) terms, it may still be material because of its nature.
SAS 99 defines fraud as an intentional act that results in a material misstatement in financial statements. There are two types of fraud considered: misstatements arising from fraudulent financial reporting (e.g. falsification of accounting records) and misstatements arising from misappropriation of assets (e.g. theft of assets or fraudulent expenditures).
For example, an auditor may: physically examine inventory as evidence that inventory shown in the accounting records actually exists (existence assertion); inspect supporting documents like invoices to confirm that sales did occur (occurrence); arrange for suppliers to confirm in writing the details of the amount owing at balance date as evidence that accounts payable is a liability (rights ...
Audit evidence collection is also being improved through audit data analytics, which also provide the auditor the ability to view the entire population of data, rather than just a sample. [4] Viewing greater amounts of data leads to a more efficient audit and a greater understanding of the audit evidence.
For example, if the year-end is 31 December, the hard close may provide the auditors with figures as at 30 November. The auditors would audit income/expense movements between 1 January and 30 November, so that after year end, it is only necessary for them to audit the December income/expense movements and 31 December balance sheet.
The objective is to determine the nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures in order to reduce audit risk to an acceptable low level. ISA 400 talks about the "walk through testing" or auditing in depth test.
In developing that conclusion, the auditor evaluates whether audit evidence corroborates or contradicts financial statement assertions. [2] Second, auditors are required to consider the risk of material misstatement through understanding the entity and its environment, including the entity's internal control.
Inherent risk is one of two components of the risk of material misstatement i.e. the risk that the financial statements are materiality misstated prior to audit. The other component is control risk. [1] Audit risk is a function of the risk of material misstatement and detection risk. [1]