Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Senior Circuit Judge Roger Leland Wollman: inactive: 1934 1985–2018 1999–2002 2018–present Reagan: 45 Senior Circuit Judge C. Arlen Beam: inactive: 1930 1987–2001 — 2001–present Reagan: 47 Senior Circuit Judge David R. Hansen: inactive: 1938 1991–2003 2002–2003 2003–present G.H.W. Bush: 48 Senior Circuit Judge Morris S. Arnold ...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit across Missouri in St. Louis has jurisdiction over decisions appealed from the Western District of Missouri (except for patent claims and claims against the U.S. government under the Tucker Act, which are appealed to the Federal Circuit).
Frosty Treats, Inc. v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., 426 F.3d 1001 (8th Cir. 2005): Trademark and trade dress. United States v. $124,700 in U.S. Currency, 458 F.3d 822 (8th Cir. 2006): Transport of large amounts of currency concealed in an unusual manner could be taken as evidence that the currency was connected with drug trafficking.
The defendant, Jammie Thomas-Rasset, was found liable to the plaintiff record company for making 24 songs available to the public for free on the Kazaa file sharing service and ordered to pay $220,000. Before filing suit, Capitol Records offered to settle for $5,000, but Thomas-Rasset declined. The ultimate damage order came after several ...
The United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas (in case citations, W.D. Ark.) is a federal court in the Eighth Circuit (except for patent claims and claims against the U.S. government under the Tucker Act, which are appealed to the Federal Circuit).
Status of other Floyd protest lawsuits The decision allowing Williams' lawsuit to go to trial is the latest in a series of setbacks for the city in defending its officers' conduct during the 2020 ...
Days after Welte's Nov. 17 ruling, Howe announced plans to appeal, citing a recent 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision that private individuals and groups such as the NAACP can’t sue ...
Frosty Treats, Inc. v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., 426 F.3d 1001 (8th Cir. 2005), [1] is a trademark case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that the name of one of the largest ice cream truck franchise companies in the United States was neither distinctive nor famous enough to receive protection against being used in a violent video game.