Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A Wikipedia that was influenced by financial donations would have access to far more money than whatever you are claiming you would have donated. Imagine a Wikipedia where the willingness to donate was allowed to control content and discussions.
Charles Kushner, real estate developer and founder of Kushner Companies [42] Larry Mizel, executive chairman of MDC Holdings [23] [verification needed] Kendra Todd, real estate broker [43] Steve Witkoff, real estate investor [24] [needs update]
In January 2021, a number of companies halted their political contributions in the United States, primarily in response to some Republican legislators' objections to certification of the 2021 United States Electoral College vote count and the ensuing mob that attacked the U.S. Capitol.
Contribution is what makes Wikipedia a great, informative site. Unfortunately, many users get caught up in Wikipedia's swirling community aspects. This is in no way a bad thing, so long as said user can monitor their progress and keep their eyes on the real reason for contributions. First off, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a promotional ...
The editing and deletion discussions are manned by volunteers. Your donation would not have changed their income or the comfort of their work. The different treatment you desire would not be worth the donation. The editors you are talking to are not likely to want a Wikipedia stripped of proper editorial review or to be a more promotional site.
A note on the separate status of the Wikimedia Endowment. The Wikimedia Endowment, held from 2016 to 2023 by the Tides Foundation and now a standalone 501(c)(3) nonprofit, is not and has never been included in Wikimedia Foundation assets, even though Wikimedia Foundation fundraising staff solicit donations to the Endowment and the Wikimedia Foundation itself made donations to the Endowment.
One fundamental reason is Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion #5, which includes the sentence: Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so. More practical is what Andreas lays out in quite a lot of ...
For anyone who isn't familiar with this work page: it as a "list of the blocked Wikipedia accounts of companies involved in undisclosed paid editing". Even today, the vast majority of the page is devoted to the list at Undisclosed paid editing , especially those "blocked at least once".