enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Squeeze-out - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze-out

    The legal community has criticized the present rules with regard to freeze-out mergers as being biased against the interests of the minority shareholders. For example, if a gain in stock value is anticipated by the majority, they can deprive the frozen-out minority of its share of those gains. [4]

  3. Smith v Croft (No 2) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v_Croft_(No_2)

    Minority shareholders claimed to recover money paid away contrary to the financial assistance prohibition (now found at section 678 of the Companies Act 2006) and being ultra vires. They had 14% of the company's shares, the defendants held 63%, and another shareholder, who did not want litigation, held 21%.

  4. Shareholder oppression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder_oppression

    Shareholder oppression occurs when the majority shareholders in a corporation take action that unfairly prejudices the minority. It most commonly occurs in non-publicly traded companies, because the lack of a public market for shares leaves minority shareholders particularly vulnerable, since minority shareholders cannot escape mistreatment by selling their stock and exiting the corporation. [1]

  5. Allen v Gold Reefs of West Africa Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_v_Gold_Reefs_of_West...

    Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1951] Ch 286, removing a pre-emption right to prevent a minority shareholder buying up shares in a battle for control was valid Rights and Issues Investment Trust Ltd v Stylo Shoes Ltd [1965] Ch 250, doubling voting rights of management shares to preserve their strength after a large new share issue when ...

  6. Shareholders to be Wiped Out First if Bank Fails

    www.aol.com/news/2012-12-10-shareholders-to-be...

    And now the bad news: Shareholders will be first in line to absorb any losses incurred in winding up a failing bank. One Financial Times reporter put it less delicately: "Shareholders should ...

  7. Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhalgh_v_Arderne...

    Mr Mallard, the majority shareholder, wished to transfer his shares for 6 shillings each to Mr Sol Sheckman in return for £5000 and his resignation from the board. Mr Greenhalgh wished to prevent control of the company going away, and argued that the article change was invalid, a fraud on him and the other minority shareholders, and asked for ...

  8. Macy’s is in deep trouble. It could be sitting on a gold mine

    www.aol.com/finance/macy-deep-trouble-could...

    Macy’s and other department stores, such as Kohl’s, Nordstrom and JCPenney, have lost out in recent years to online retailers like Amazon; big box retailers that sell groceries and a range of ...

  9. Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in ...

    www.aol.com/appeals-court-scraps-nasdaq...

    A federal appeals court blocked Nasdaq rules to increase boardroom diversity, saying that the Securities and Exchange Commission did not have the authority to approve them.. Wednesday’s ruling ...