enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. McCleary v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCleary_v._Washington

    Washington), commonly known as the McCleary Decision, [1] was a lawsuit against the State of Washington. The case alleged that the state, in the body of the state legislature, had failed to meet the state constitutional duty (in Article IX, Section 1) "to make ample provision for the education of all children residing within its borders."

  3. LGBTQ rights in Washington (state) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_Washington...

    In 1893, shortly after statehood, in the case of State v. Place, the Washington Supreme Court took note of the absence of a sodomy law. The Washington State Legislature acted swiftly, enacting Washington's first ever sodomy law only 19 days after the Place ruling. It prohibited "crimes against nature" with ten to fourteen years' imprisonment.

  4. Arlene's Flowers lawsuit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlene's_Flowers_lawsuit

    Following the state high court's decision, Stutzman filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, asking the Court to hear the case. [27] During this case, a similar case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, had made its way to the Supreme Court, and which was decided in early June ...

  5. United States v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Washington

    United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), commonly known as the Boldt Decision (from the name of the trial court judge, George Hugo Boldt), was a legal case in 1974 heard in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

  6. This Washington couple took their 'unconstitutional' $15K IRS ...

    www.aol.com/finance/unconstitutional-washington...

    On Dec. 5, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moore v. United States , a case that centers on the mandatory repatriation tax (MRT) included in 2017’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

  7. Lockyer v. Andrade - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockyer_v._Andrade

    Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), [1] decided the same day as Ewing v. California (a case with a similar subject matter), [2] held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments.

  8. Sen. Lindsey Graham plans to block Democrats' effort to ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/sen-lindsey-graham-says-block...

    Sen. Lindsey Graham, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, plans to block an effort by Senate Democrats to unanimously pass a Supreme Court ethics bill Wednesday on the Senate floor.

  9. Archy Lee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archy_Lee

    The Supreme Court decision was authored by Peter Burnett, who authored a bill banning African Americans from the State of Oregon as a legislator there, and who unsuccessfully urged the same bill in California while he was Governor. Justice Burnett's decision was joined by Justice David S. Terry, who would later fight for the Confederacy.