Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The stock issues are harms, inherency, solvency, topicality, and significance: Significance: This answers the "why" of debate.All advantages and disadvantages to the status quo (resulting from inherency) and of the plan (resulting from solvency) are evaluated under significance.
One traditional way to judge policy debate is to judge the Affirmative on four issues or burdens to meet, called the stock issues. The four stock issues are modeled after U.S. court procedural aspects of administrative law in deciding cases (as opposed to Constitutional controversies): ill (Harm), blame (Inherency), cure (Solvency), cost ...
In values debate, a "Significance" is a judgment about any crucial aspect of the team's debate outline, and Topicality is secondary to the Stock Issues. Significance goes toward Solvency and is weighed against Inherency, not Harms, that there is unknown danger in change (for example, from deterrence to deproliferation).
Tuesday's presidential debate could also impact investor sentiment. US stocks were up on Tuesday, with investors looking to add to Monday's rebound following the big sell-off at the end of last week.
Debate background: Immigration a key issue even as encounters at southern border drop Immigration has been one of the top issues for voters during the presidential campaign season.
Topicality is a resolution issue in policy debate which pertains to whether or not the plan affirms the resolution as worded. [1] To contest the topicality of the affirmative, the negative interprets a word or words in the resolution and argues that the affirmative does not meet that definition, that the interpretation is preferable, and that non-topicality should be a voting issue.
Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump will meet for the first time on Tuesday for a presidential debate hosted by ABC News. Hot-button political issues that are likely to ...
Falls under the stock issue of inherency. Impact: an argument explaining why that condition of the status quo is damaging. Falls under the stock issue of harms. Solvency: an argument describing how the plan can alter the status quo to avoid the impact. Method 2. This method is more popular and widely used in National PF(Public Form) Debate.