enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Missouri v. Seibert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._Seibert

    Missouri v. Seibert , 542 U.S. 600 (2004), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that struck down the police practice of first obtaining an inadmissible confession without giving Miranda warnings , then issuing the warnings, and then obtaining a second confession.

  3. Marcus v. Search Warrant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_v._Search_Warrant

    Marcus v. Search Warrant, 367 U.S. 717 (1961), full title Marcus v.Search Warrant of Property at 104 East Tenth Street, Kansas City, Missouri, is an in rem case decided by the United States Supreme Court on the seizure of obscene materials.

  4. List of long-term false imprisonment cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_long-term_false...

    Rosalynn McGinnis, Missouri, United States, 19 years, escaped in 2016. [19] Sheffield incest case, UK, 25 years, discovered in November 2008. Schollenberger Case, Lebanon, Pennsylvania, United States, 10 years, discovered in May 2020. [20] South Wales paternal sex abuse case, South Wales, UK, 20 years, discovered in October 2019. [21] [22] [23 ...

  5. False imprisonment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_imprisonment

    A false imprisonment claim may be made based upon private acts, or upon wrongful governmental detention. For detention by the police, proof of false imprisonment provides a basis to obtain a writ of habeas corpus. [2] Under common law, false imprisonment is both a crime and a tort.

  6. Duren v. Missouri - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duren_v._Missouri

    Duren was indicted in 1975 for first-degree murder and first-degree robbery. In a pretrial motion to quash his jury panel, and again in a post-conviction motion for a new trial, he claimed that his right to trial by a jury chosen from a fair cross section of his community was denied by provisions of Missouri law granting women who so request an automatic exemption from jury service.

  7. Lawsuit claims new Missouri court secrecy law mandating ...

    www.aol.com/lawsuit-claims-missouri-court...

    The 2023 statute requires removal of almost all personal identifiers, including witness and victim names and addresses, from public court documents.

  8. Is the Missouri House violating transparency requirements ...

    www.aol.com/news/missouri-house-violating...

    The Missouri Court of Appeals Western District held oral arguments on Tuesday over House Rule 126, which says legislators can “keep constituent case files, and records of the caucus of the ...

  9. Missouri v. McNeely - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._McNeely

    Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141 (2013), was a case decided by United States Supreme Court, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Missouri, regarding exceptions to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution under exigent circumstances.