Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1967] 2 AC 291 is a leading English trusts law case, concerning resulting trusts. It demonstrates that the mere intention to not have a resulting trust (for example, to avoid taxes) does not make it so. This case was the first in a series of decisions involving Tony Vandervell's trusts and his tax ...
The first was Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners, [1] where the House of Lords was concerned with whether an oral instruction to transfer an equitable interest in shares complied with the writing requirement under Law of Property Act 1925 section 53(1)(c), and so whether receipt of dividends was subject to tax.
Re Vandervell Trustees Ltd [1971] AC 912 is a UK tax law case, concerning the ability of the Revenue to amend tax assessments. This case was the second in a series of decisions involving Tony Vandervell 's trusts and his tax liability.
What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code
See if your favorite made the list. This map from Google Trends shows which Christmas cookies are the most searched for in America by state in 2024. See if your favorite made the list.
Barnes v Addy; Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd; Belchier v Parsons; Belmont Finance Corp Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd (No 2) Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Homan; Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell (No 2) Blackwell v Blackwell; Boardman v Phipps; Boyce v Boyce; Brinks Ltd v Abu-Saleh (No 3) Brown v Burdett; Brown v ...
A judge in Brazil has ordered Adele’s song Million Years Ago to be removed globally from streaming services due to a plagiarism claim by Brazilian composer, Toninho Geraes. Geraes alleges that ...
It is important to stress that this is only a presumption, which presumption is easily rebutted either by the counter- presumption of advancement or by direct evidence of A's intention to make an outright transfer: see Underhill and Hayton (supra) p. 317 et seq.; Vandervell v IRC [1967] 2 AC 291 at 312 et seq.;