Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An article dedicated to criticism should pass notability guidelines; that is, the criticism itself should be the subject of independent, reliable sources. Such articles should not be a repository of all things critical, but a review of significant sources of criticism.
Generally it is not a good idea to have articles swamped by criticism. Some policies and guidelines that help determine the amount of criticism an article should hold: WP:BALASPS: space devoted to criticism in a Wikipedia article should reflect the overall proportion of criticism in reliable sources on the subject of the article.
Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field.
An article on discussing the differences between you and your close friends. It does not matter to most people in the world. An article about how Tyson Foods is run by a bunch of chicken fuckers because the main article is protected from vandalism by the legions of Internet trolls. [citation needed] Yet another list of Google Doodles.
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 26 February 2025. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...
Source criticism (or information evaluation) is the process of evaluating an information source, i.e.: a document, a person, a speech, a fingerprint, a photo, an observation, or anything used in order to obtain knowledge. In relation to a given purpose, a given information source may be more or less valid, reliable or relevant.
“Unlike a Protestant service, which is much more dependent on the preacher, you can’t criticize an Orthodox service. It’s like going to a ballet and saying, like, ‘What’s going on here?’
Aesthetic criticism is a part of aesthetics concerned with critically judging beauty and ugliness, tastefulness and tastelessness, style and fashion, meaning and quality of design—and issues of human sentiment and affect (the evoking of pleasure and pain, likes and dislikes).