Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
use the template {} to nominate an article for Featured article review; The status "FAR" is treated as invalid for similar reasons as FAC above. Instead of using this template to record featured article reviews, you should use the specialized template, Template:FAR, instead. While the review candidacy is underway, simply leave this template ...
More than one stub template may be used, if necessary, though no more than four should be used on any article. Place a stub template at the very end of the article, after the "External links" section, any navigation templates, and the category tags. As usual, templates are added by including their name inside double braces, e.g. {{Psychology ...
Template documentation This template's initial visibility currently defaults to autocollapse , meaning that if there is another collapsible item on the page (a navbox, sidebar , or table with the collapsible attribute ), it is hidden apart from its title bar; if not, it is fully visible.
Instead of using this template to record featured article reviews, you should use the specialized template, Template:FAR, instead. While the review candidacy is underway, simply leave this template with the old status. Then a bot will update the {{article history}} template when the review discussion is closed.
This helps with the categorization of articles requiring attention. The simplest way to add this template to an article is to copy and paste {{Review|date=December 2024}} at the top of the article or talk page. Add a new item to the talk page explaining the problem so editors will know what to address, and when to remove this tag.
To review an article you must: Be a registered user—make sure you are logged in. Not be the nominator nor have made significant contributions to the article prior to the review—opening your own review is not allowed and will delay the article's review. Remember: Once you start a review, you are committing to complete it in a timely manner.
Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field.
If an upmerged template is used on more than 60 stubs you can request a sub-category at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals. This page has a backlog that requires the attention of willing editors. This notice will hide when this category has fewer than 250 items.