Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Proklamasi Kemerdekaan Indonesia: English name: Proclamation of Indonesian Independence: Date: 17 August 1945; 79 years ago () Time: 10:00 AM JST : Venue: Sukarno's house at 56 Jalan Pegangsaan Timur, (now Taman Proklamasi). Location: Jakarta, Japanese-occupied Dutch East Indies → Republic of Indonesia: Participants: Signatories: Sukarno ...
The building was converted into a residence for Rear Admiral Tadashi Maeda in 1942.. The building was built in 1920 following the design of J.F.L. Blankenberg. [1] It is a two-floored, 1,138 m2 Art-Deco-style building over a 3,914 m2 plot of land.
Based on Presidential Decree No. 155/2024, [2] and as expanded by Ministry of Law Decree No. 1/2024 [3] and 2/2024, [4] the Ministry of Law is organized into the following: Office of the Minister for Law; Office of the Deputy Minister for Law; General Secretariat Bureau of Planning and Organization; Bureau of Human Resources; Bureau of Finance
Monument of the Proclamator Heroes Sukarno-Hatta in the Taman Proklamasi, Jakarta by sculptor Nyoman Nuarta. Taman Proklamasi (Proclamation Park) is a park complex located in Central Jakarta, Indonesia. The park is located at the former property of Sukarno at what was known as the house at Jalan Pegangsaan Timur 56.
On 4 July 1927, Sukarno with his friends from the Algemeene Studieclub established a pro-independence party, the Indonesian National Party (PNI), of which Sukarno was elected the first leader. The party advocated independence for Indonesia , and opposed imperialism and capitalism because it opined that both systems worsened the life of ...
[12] In 1818, Dalhousie University was established in Nova Scotia, adopting the motto of Ora et Labora in 1870. This is also the motto of Clan Ramsay, of which the Earl of Dalhousie is the leader. [13] In 1874, Wesley College, Colombo, a high school in Sri Lanka, was founded by Methodist missionaries. It has been using "Ora Et Labora" as the ...
In law, a question of law, also known as a point of law, is a question that must be answered by a judge and can not be answered by a jury. [1] Such a question is distinct from a question of fact, which must be answered by reference to facts and evidence as well as inferences arising from those facts.
[8] In this sense, the commentary is similar to a digest (nibandha) in that it attempts to draw into the commentary outside opinions about the same passages of the text which he is commenting on. Although he is commenting on the Yājñavalkya Smṛti , he cites numerous earlier commentators as well, including Viśvarūpa, [ 9 ] Mēdhātithi ...