Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
These technologies, often described as "generative AI," raise questions about whether the material they produce is protected by copyright, whether works consisting of both human-authored and AI-generated material may be registered, and what information should be provided to the Office by applicants seeking to register them.
In the submission, OpenAI claimed creating "leading AI models” would be “impossible” without using copyrighted material and that relying instead on text in the public domain would result in ...
Attitudes around copyright took a drastic shift in 2022, when OpenAI released the first commercial generative AI model, according to Ed Newton-Rex, who has worked on generative AI models since ...
The plaintiffs allege that the generative AI companies used their copyrighted work unauthorized to train their AI models, thereby enabling them to generate work in the styles of particular artists ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file
Not all jurisdictions have the same view. For example, the UK maintains the view AI-generated works are normally copyrightable, and that the copyright is held by the operator/creator/custodian of the AI: [2] The UK is one of only a handful of countries to protect works generated by a computer where there is no human creator.
OpenAI and Microsoft have said that using copyrighted works to train AI products amounts to "fair use," a legal doctrine governing the unlicensed use of copyrighted material.
Both sets of cases pose novel questions for the courts, including whether the law should make exceptions for AI's use of copyrighted material to create something new. The record labels' cases ...