enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Janus v. AFSCME - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_v._AFSCME

    Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.

  3. Communications Workers of America v. Beck - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Workers_of...

    Communications Workers of America v. Beck, 487 U.S. 735 (1988), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that, in a union security agreement, unions are authorized by statute to collect from non-members only those fees and dues necessary to perform its duties as a collective bargaining representative. [1]

  4. Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Systems_Corp._v._Lewis

    Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on how two federal laws, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), relate to whether employment contracts can legally bar employees from collective arbitration.

  5. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v...

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...

  6. Supreme Court likely to shoot down Mexico's $10B lawsuit ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-likely-shoot-down...

    MORE: Supreme Court finds 'radical agreement' in employment discrimination case. Justice Brett Kavanaugh raised concern about the broader implications of a decision allowing Mexico's suit to go ...

  7. Remain in Mexico - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remain_in_Mexico

    On December 15, 2022, U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk prevented the Biden administration from ending the program, ruling that it should stay in place while legal challenges play out, following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to return the case to the lower courts. [36] However, Kacsmaryk did not order the policy reinstated. [37]

  8. Supreme Court unanimous ruling may pave way for mass ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-unanimous-ruling-may...

    (The Center Square) – A unanimous ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may pave the way for challenges to a federal deportation plan under the incoming Trump administration to be defeated. The ...

  9. United States v. Belmont - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Belmont

    On May 3, 1937, the United States Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Circuit Court's decision in holding: (1) The president has the power to initiate executive agreements with foreign states without the advice or consent of the Senate; (2) The executive agreements are binding over state constitutions, laws, and policies; and (3) The United ...