Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Properly describing or enumerating the contents of a free object can be easy or difficult, depending on the particular algebraic object in question. For example, the free group in two generators is easily described. By contrast, little or nothing is known about the structure of free Heyting algebras in more than one generator. [1]
A faithful functor need not be injective on objects or morphisms. That is, two objects X and X′ may map to the same object in D (which is why the range of a full and faithful functor is not necessarily isomorphic to C), and two morphisms f : X → Y and f′ : X′ → Y′ (with different domains/codomains) may map to the same morphism in D.
A functor from G to Set is then nothing but a group action of G on a particular set, i.e. a G-set. Likewise, a functor from G to the category of vector spaces, Vect K, is a linear representation of G. In general, a functor G → C can be considered as an "action" of G on an object in the category C. If C is a group, then this action is a group ...
Diagrams and functor categories are often visualized by commutative diagrams, particularly if the index category is a finite poset category with few elements: one draws a commutative diagram with a node for every object in the index category, and an arrow for a generating set of morphisms, omitting identity maps and morphisms that can be ...
A commutative diagram in a category C can be interpreted as a functor from an index category J to C; one calls the functor a diagram. More formally, a commutative diagram is a visualization of a diagram indexed by a poset category. Such a diagram typically includes: a node for every object in the index category,
Well-formed output language code fragments Any programming language (proven for C, C++, Java, C#, PHP, COBOL) gSOAP: C / C++ WSDL specifications C / C++ code that can be used to communicate with WebServices. XML with the definitions obtained. Microsoft Visual Studio LightSwitch: C# / VB.NET Active Tier Database schema
Universal constructions are functorial in nature: if one can carry out the construction for every object in a category C then one obtains a functor on C. Furthermore, this functor is a right or left adjoint to the functor U used in the definition of the universal property. [2] Universal properties occur everywhere in mathematics.
The free group F S with free generating set S can be constructed as follows. S is a set of symbols, and we suppose for every s in S there is a corresponding "inverse" symbol, s −1, in a set S −1. Let T = S ∪ S −1, and define a word in S to be any written product of elements of T. That is, a word in S is an element of the monoid ...