Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Conciliation is an alternative dispute resolution process whereby the parties to a dispute rely on a neutral third-party known as the conciliator, to assist them in solving their dispute. The conciliator, who may meet with the parties both separately and together, does this by; lowering tensions, improving communication, interpreting issues ...
The book studies the concept of arbitration, mediation and conciliation procedure in ancient India and present. Considering law students in mind, author did justice to conceptualize the alternative dispute resolutions such as arbitration, mediation and conciliation into an easily understanding language.
Mediation's effectiveness in trans-border disputes has been questioned, but an understanding of fundamental mediation principles points to the unlimited potential of mediation in such disputes. Mediators explicitly address and manage cultural and language differences in detail during the process.
Conciliation differs from arbitration in that the conciliation process is not binding and the conciliator does not seek evidence or call witnesses and does not write a decision. Conciliation differs from mediation in that the conciliation process is more open for parties to discuss and focuses on removing stress and concerns before discussing ...
mediation; conciliation; negotiation; facilitation; avoidance; One could theoretically include violence or even war as part of this spectrum, but dispute resolution practitioners do not usually do so; violence rarely ends disputes effectively, and indeed, often only escalates them. Also, violence rarely causes the parties involved in the ...
Mediation cases were handled by people appointed as Commissioners of Conciliation, [2] who vowed to act impartially. [5] The conciliation process could be brought into play for both strike actions and lockouts and for any other type of industrial and labor relations matter. [2] Participation in mediation was voluntary. [2]
Dispute mechanisms are used in dispute resolution, and may incorporate conciliation, conflict resolution, mediation, and negotiation. Otherwise known as grievance mechanisms , dispute mechanisms are typical non-judicial [ 2 ] in nature, meaning that they are not resolved within the court of law.
Before modern state law was introduced under colonialism, African customary legal systems mainly relied on mediation and conciliation. In many countries, these traditional mechanisms have been integrated into the official legal system. In Benin, specialised tribunaux de conciliation hear cases on a broad range of civil law matters. Results are ...