enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: california negligence law auto

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_v._Yellow_Cab_Co.

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

  3. American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Motorcycle_Ass'n_v...

    American Motorcycle Association v. Superior Court, 20 Cal. 3d 578 (1978), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that first adopted a comparative fault regime for apportionment of liability among multiple tortfeasors for negligence in California. [1]

  4. Dillon v. Legg - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dillon_v._Legg

    Dillon v. Legg, 68 Cal. 2d 728 (1968), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that established the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress.To date, it is the most persuasive decision of the most persuasive state supreme court in the United States during the latter half of the 20th century: Dillon has been favorably cited and followed by at least twenty reported out-of ...

  5. What do recent Supreme Court actions mean for California auto ...

    www.aol.com/news/recent-supreme-court-actions...

    California policymakers and environmentalists view recent Supreme Court actions as a small victory for clean air, but worry about future legal challenges.

  6. Personal injury - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_injury

    For automobile accidents in California, a plaintiff must show proof of financial responsibility (California Vehicle Code sections 16000-16078) to claim economical and non-economical damages. [38] Proving the minimum financial responsibility means that a person must be insured by the state's minimum coverage of insurance, which in some cases may ...

  7. Krouse v. Graham - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krouse_v._Graham

    Krouse v. Graham, 19 Cal.3d 59 (1977), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California ruling that a lack of visual perception of an accident did not necessarily preclude recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress. [1]

  8. These states are increasing minimum coverage requirements in 2025

    www.aol.com/finance/states-increasing-minimum...

    What is the new insurance law in California? Old minimum car insurance liability limits: 15/30/5. New minimum car insurance liability limits: 30/60/15. Change effective Jan. 1, 2025.

  9. GSK settles two California lawsuits related to heartburn drug ...

    www.aol.com/news/gsk-settles-two-california...

    Former Zantac makers GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi and Boehringer Ingelheim are facing about 4,000 claims in California state court and about 2,000 in various other state courts around the country.

  1. Ad

    related to: california negligence law auto