enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Proto-Indo-European phonology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_phonology

    The following arguments can be set forth against recognizing *a as a phoneme of PIE: it does not participate in ablaut alternations (it does not alternate with other vowels, as the "real" PIE vowels *e, *o, *ē, *ō do), it makes no appearance in suffixes and endings, it appears in a very confined set of positions (usually after initial *k ...

  3. Proto-Indo-European root - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_root

    Typically, a root plus a suffix forms a stem, and adding an ending forms a word. [1]+ ⏟ + ⏟ For example, *bʰéreti 'he bears' can be split into the root *bʰer-'to bear', the suffix *-e-which governs the imperfective aspect, and the ending *-ti, which governs the present tense, third-person singular.

  4. Template:PIE - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PIE

    No description. Template parameters [Edit template data] Parameter Description Type Status 1 1 no description Unknown optional wrap wrap no description Unknown optional See also {{ IAST }} {{ transliteration }} The above documentation is transcluded from Template:PIE/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Add ...

  5. Proto-Indo-European language - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language

    In 1892, Jacob Wackernagel reconstructed PIE's word order as subject–verb–object (SVO), based on evidence in Vedic Sanskrit. [60] Winfred P. Lehmann (1974), on the other hand, reconstructs PIE as a subject–object–verb (SOV) language. He posits that the presence of person marking in PIE verbs motivated a shift from OV to VO order in ...

  6. Proto-Indo-European nominals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_nominals

    All except the Latin form suggest a masculine u-stem with non-ablauting PIE root *ǵen-, but certain irregularities (the position of the accent, the unexpected feminine ā-stem form in Latin, the unexpected Gothic stem kinn-< ǵenw-, the ablaut found in Greek gnáthos 'jaw' < PIE *ǵnHdʰ-, Lithuanian žándas 'jawbone' < *ǵonHdʰ-os) suggest ...

  7. Indo-European vocabulary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_vocabulary

    For Welsh, normally the modern form is given, but occasionally the form from Old Welsh is supplied when it is known and displays important features lost in the modern form. A Middle Irish cognate is given when the Old Irish form is unknown, and Gaulish, Cornish and/or Breton (modern) cognates may occasionally be given in place of or in addition ...

  8. Proto-Indo-European pronouns - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_pronouns

    PIE had personal pronouns in the first and second person, but not the third person, where demonstratives were used instead. They were inflected for case and number (singular, dual , and plural ), but not for gender.

  9. Proto-Indo-European particles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_particles

    Untranslated reflexes have the same meaning as the PIE word. In the following languages, two reflexes separated by a slash mean: English: Old English / Modern English; German: Old High German / New High German; Irish: Old Irish / Modern Irish; Persian: Old Persian / Modern Persian; Tocharian: Tocharian A / Tocharian B