enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Open-fields doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-fields_doctrine

    The open-fields doctrine (also open-field doctrine or open-fields rule), in the U.S. law of criminal procedure, is the legal doctrine that a "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, "unless there is some other legal basis for the ...

  3. Hester v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hester_v._United_States

    Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which established the open-fields doctrine. [1] In an opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, the Court held that "the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their 'persons, houses, papers and effects', is not extended to the open fields."

  4. Oliver v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_v._United_States

    United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court decision relating to the open fields doctrine limiting the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Background [ edit ]

  5. After 100 Years, End the Open Fields Doctrine - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/100-years-end-open-fields...

    Federal agents are allowed to search private property without a warrant under this Prohibition-era Supreme Court precedent.

  6. Wolf v. Colorado - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_v._Colorado

    Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held 6—3 that, while the Fourth Amendment was applicable to the states, the exclusionary rule was not a necessary ingredient of the Fourth Amendment's right against warrantless and unreasonable searches and seizures.

  7. Public employee pension plans in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_employee_pension...

    Federal Employees Retirement System - covers approximately 2.44 million full-time civilian employees (as of Dec 2005). [2]Retired pay for U.S. Armed Forces retirees is, strictly speaking, not a pension but instead is a form of retainer pay. U.S. military retirees do not vest into a retirement system while they are on active duty; eligibility for non-disability retired pay is solely based upon ...

  8. McConnell criticizes federal judges for reversing retirement ...

    www.aol.com/mcconnell-criticizes-federal-judges...

    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., criticized two U.S. district court judges who reversed plans to retire after former President Trump won re-election.

  9. United States v. Dunn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Dunn

    United States v. Dunn , 480 U.S. 294 (1987), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision relating to the open fields doctrine limiting the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution . [ 1 ]