Ad
related to: breach of express term contract act ontario
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A typical and broadly representative example of such a statute is Ontario's Sale of Goods Act, which defines a "contract for the sale of goods" as "a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in the goods to the buyer for a money consideration" and defines an "agreement to sell" as a contract "where the transfer ...
The term "Contract B" is used to differentiate the actual construction contract from the tender contract or "Contract A". Tied to the concept of "Contract A", Contract B is a place holder in the concept, a marker at the end of a formalized process of equitable treatment of both bidders and owners. [3]
The test is that set out for repudiatory breach, above. The concept of fundamental breach as a free standing legal concept no longer has any legal force [26] but is now simply another possible term of a contract that needs to be construed like any other term of a contract. A fundamental breach is usually read as a reference to a repudiatory ...
Breach of a condition will entitle the innocent party to terminate the contract. [3] A warranty [4] is less imperative than a condition, so the contract will survive a breach. Breach of either a condition or a warranty will give rise to damages. It is an objective matter of fact whether a term goes to the root of a contract.
Inducing a breach of contract was a tort of accessory liability, and an intention to cause a breach of contract was a necessary and sufficient requirement for liability; a person had to know that he was inducing a breach of contract and to intend to do so; that a conscious decision not to inquire into the existence of a fact could be treated as ...
The test of whether one has acted in good faith is a subjective one; the cases suggest honesty, and possibly also reasonably. There is no general obligation to act in good faith term under English contract law: an attempt was made by Lord Denning in a series of case during the 70s and 80s but they are no longer considered 'good law'. European ...
Anticipatory repudiation or anticipatory breach is a concept in the law of contracts which describes words or conduct by a contracting party that evinces an intention not to perform or not to be bound by provisions of the agreement that require performance in the future.
Although a suit for breach of contract is relatively straightforward, there are advantages in bringing a parallel suit in misrepresentation, because whereas repudiation is available only for breach of condition, [17] rescission is prima facie available for all misrepresentations, subject to the provisions of s.2 of the Misrepresentation Act ...
Ad
related to: breach of express term contract act ontario