enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental health

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case Ruling Right 1978 Rennie v. Klein: An involuntarily committed, legally competent patient who refused medication had a right to professional medical review of the treating psychiatrist's decision. The Court left the decision-making process to medical professionals. 14th 1990 Washington v. Harper

  3. Right to health - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_health

    The right to health is the ... marks the first formal demarcation of a right to health in international law. ... accommodations for security in case of physical ...

  4. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. The original 1974 decision mandated warning the threatened ...

  5. O'Connor v. Donaldson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O'Connor_v._Donaldson

    O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in mental health law ruling that a state cannot constitutionally confine a non-dangerous individual who is capable of surviving safely in freedom by themselves or with the help of willing and responsible family members or friends.

  6. Washington v. Harper - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_v._Harper

    The trial court rejected his claim but the State Supreme Court reversed the decision and remanded the case back to the trial court stating that the State could administer antipsychotic medication to a competent, nonconsenting inmate only if, in a judicial hearing, at which the inmate had full adversarial procedural protections, the State could ...

  7. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_Woman's_Health_v...

    Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016), was a landmark decision [1] of the US Supreme Court announced on June 27, 2016. The Court ruled 5–3 that Texas cannot place restrictions on the delivery of abortion services that create an undue burden for women seeking an abortion.

  8. Indian state passes historic ‘right to health’ law. So why ...

    www.aol.com/indian-state-passes-historic-health...

    Rajasthan’s groundbreaking new law compels all healthcare facilities to provide emergency care without receiving up-front payment but doctors fear it will ultimately leave them picking up the bill.

  9. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruzan_v._Director...

    Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving a young adult incompetent. The first "right to die" case ever heard by the Court, Cruzan was argued on December 6, 1989, and decided on June 25