Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The command to create a local repo, git init, creates a branch named master. [61] [111] Often it is used as the integration branch for merging changes into. [112] Since the default upstream remote is named origin, [113] the default remote branch is origin/master. Some tools such as GitHub and GitLab create a default branch named main instead.
git fetch downloads changes from a remote repository into the local clone git reset makes the current branch point to some specific revision or branch. git reset --hard makes the current branch point to some specific revision or branch, and replaces the current working files with the files from that branch. git merge merges files from a given ...
Manual merging is also required when automatic merging runs into a change conflict; for instance, very few automatic merge tools can merge two changes to the same line of code (say, one that changes a function name, and another that adds a comment). In these cases, revision control systems resort to the user to specify the intended merge result.
Working copies effectively function as remote backups, which avoids relying on one physical machine as a single point of failure. [5] Allows various development models to be used, such as using development branches or a Commander/Lieutenant model. [6] Permits centralized control of the "release version" of the project [citation needed]
Cherry-picking: move only some revisions from a branch to another one (instead of merging the branches) Bisect: binary search of source history for a change that introduced or fixed a regression; Incoming/outgoing: query the differences between the local repository and a remote one (the patches that would be fetched/sent on a pull/push)
Unfortunately, there has to be a country that comes in last, and for me, it's Germany. That said, I've been twice, and the second time was better than the first.
Kent State is winless entering its final game against Buffalo. With a loss, the Golden Flashes could close one of the worst seasons this century.
Keira Knightley’s number one reason for having no more kids isn’t the pain of childbirth or the endless nights of disrupted sleep.. On Monday, Dec. 9. the actress, 39, gushed about her two ...