Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The term psychological warfare is believed to have migrated from Germany to the United States in 1941. [68] During World War II, the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff defined psychological warfare broadly, stating "Psychological warfare employs any weapon to influence the mind of the enemy. The weapons are psychological only in the effect ...
That is the form of demoralization that is referred to as a tool of psychological warfare, and it is most commonly implemented through various forms of propaganda. [ 2 ] : 8 Propaganda as a tool of demoralization refers to influencing opinion through significant symbols, through means such as rumors, stories, pictures, reports, and other means ...
The integrated employment of the core capabilities of electronic warfare, computer network operations, psychological operations, military deception, and operations security, in concert with specified supporting and related capabilities, to influence, disrupt, corrupt or usurp adversarial human and automated decision making while protecting our own.
In a psychological context, it is used as a technique in brainwashing and abuse to disorient and disarm the victim. In the context of workplace bullying, destabilisation applied to the victim may involve: [1] [2] failure to acknowledge good work and value the victim's efforts; allocation of meaningless tasks
Handbooks and manuals about psychological warfare. Pages in category "Psychological warfare handbooks and manuals" This category contains only the following page.
Psychological Warfare South Asian kingdoms maintained thousands of elephants as an indispensable part of their military forces. Battle elephants were trained to walk in formation in regiments ...
Brainwashing [a] is the controversial idea that the human mind can be altered or controlled against a person's will by manipulative psychological techniques. [1] Brainwashing is said to reduce its subject's ability to think critically or independently, to allow the introduction of new, unwanted thoughts and ideas into their minds, [2] as well as to change their attitudes, values, and beliefs.
“After all, service members have to follow orders, and if ordered to do something it is by definition legal and moral.” Difficult problems might arise from official recognition of moral injury: how to measure the intensity of the pain, for instance, and whether the government should offer compensation, as it does for PTSD.