enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: parte simms ukhl pants ladies wear shoes
  2. stylight.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month

    • Sale

      Great selection of top brands

      at low prices.

    • Men´s Fashion

      Men's fashion from the best shops

      online - all on one site!

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    The House of Lords allowed the appeal. Lord Steyn gave the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann agreed with Lord Steyn and said the following. [note 1]Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

  3. R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Venables_and_Thompson...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts

  4. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    The case was first heard by a Divisional Court, composed of Watkins LJ and Mann J. Mann, with Watkins concurring, rejected the Northumbria Police Authority's argument, saying that under the Royal Prerogative HM Government retained the right to do whatever "was necessary to meet either an actual or an apprehended threat to the peace", something that had not previously been recognised as a ...

  5. R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    Ms Nicole Seymour-Smith and Ms Perez had made a claim against the Secretary of State for Employment that the United Kingdom's qualifying period of two years for unfair dismissal constituted indirect discrimination against women under the Treaty of the European Union, article 119 (now TFEU art 157) and the Equal Treatment Directive 76/207/EEC.

  6. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [1993] UKHL 8, [1994] 1 AC 531 was an important UK constitutional law case concerning applications for judicial review. Facts [ edit ]

  7. Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_3_of_the_Human...

    Lord Hoffmann in a case, R (Simms) v Home Secretary, which bridged the introduction of the Human Rights Act, said: [10] Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights. The Human Rights Act 1998 will not detract from this power.

  8. R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Factortame_Ltd)_v...

    The Law Reports: R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame Ltd (No. 2) [1991] 1 AC 603; Factortame II. bailii.org: ECJ's 2nd ruling, 25 July 1991; 2nd ECJ decision, official version at eur-lex; Factortame III. ECJ's 3rd ruling, 5 March 1996; Factortame IV. Divisional Court, 31 July 1997; Court of Appeal, 8 April 1998; House of ...

  9. Spats (footwear) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spats_(footwear)

    U.S. Navy Ceremonial Guard wear white canvas leggings as part of their Enlisted Full Dress Whites.. Since the mid-19th century, soldiers of various nations, especially infantry, often wore leggings or spats to protect their lower leg, to keep dirt, sand, and mud from entering their shoes, and to provide a measure of ankle support.

  1. Ad

    related to: parte simms ukhl pants ladies wear shoes