enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: parte simms ukhl pants ladies wear boots

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    The House of Lords allowed the appeal. Lord Steyn gave the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann agreed with Lord Steyn and said the following. [note 1]Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

  3. R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Venables_and_Thompson...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts

  4. Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_3_of_the_Human...

    Lord Hoffmann in a case, R (Simms) v Home Secretary, which bridged the introduction of the Human Rights Act, said: [10] Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights. The Human Rights Act 1998 will not detract from this power.

  5. R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    Ms Nicole Seymour-Smith and Ms Perez had made a claim against the Secretary of State for Employment that the United Kingdom's qualifying period of two years for unfair dismissal constituted indirect discrimination against women under the Treaty of the European Union, article 119 (now TFEU art 157) and the Equal Treatment Directive 76/207/EEC.

  6. Watkins v Home Office and others - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watkins_v_Home_Office_and...

    Watkins v Home Office and others [2006] UKHL 17, was a United Kingdom legal case heard by the House of Lords where the Home Office made an appeal as to whether the tort of misfeasance in public office was actionable in the absence of proof of pecuniary losses or injury of a mental or physical nature.

  7. R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Factortame_Ltd)_v...

    The Law Reports: R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame Ltd (No. 2) [1991] 1 AC 603; Factortame II. bailii.org: ECJ's 2nd ruling, 25 July 1991; 2nd ECJ decision, official version at eur-lex; Factortame III. ECJ's 3rd ruling, 5 March 1996; Factortame IV. Divisional Court, 31 July 1997; Court of Appeal, 8 April 1998; House of ...

  1. Ads

    related to: parte simms ukhl pants ladies wear boots