Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The transitive extension of R 1 would be denoted by R 2, and continuing in this way, in general, the transitive extension of R i would be R i + 1. The transitive closure of R, denoted by R* or R ∞ is the set union of R, R 1, R 2, ... . [8] The transitive closure of a relation is a transitive relation. [8]
In the monoid of binary endorelations on a set (with the binary operation on relations being the composition of relations), the converse relation does not satisfy the definition of an inverse from group theory, that is, if is an arbitrary relation on , then does not equal the identity relation on in general.
As an example, "is less than" is a relation on the set of natural numbers; it holds, for instance, between the values 1 and 3 (denoted as 1 < 3), and likewise between 3 and 4 (denoted as 3 < 4), but not between the values 3 and 1 nor between 4 and 4, that is, 3 < 1 and 4 < 4 both evaluate to false.
A relation algebra (L, ∧, ∨, −, 0, 1, •, I, ˘) is an algebraic structure equipped with the Boolean operations of conjunction x∧y, disjunction x∨y, and negation x −, the Boolean constants 0 and 1, the relational operations of composition x•y and converse x˘, and the relational constant I, such that these operations and constants satisfy certain equations constituting an ...
For example, the natural numbers 2 and 6 have a common factor greater than 1, and 6 and 3 have a common factor greater than 1, but 2 and 3 do not have a common factor greater than 1. The empty relation R (defined so that aRb is never true) on a set X is vacuously symmetric and transitive; however, it is not reflexive (unless X itself is empty).
The sum of the reciprocals of the pentatope numbers is 4 / 3 . Sylvester's sequence is an integer sequence in which each member of the sequence is the product of the previous members, plus one. The first few terms of the sequence are 2, 3, 7, 43, 1807 . The sum of the reciprocals of the numbers in Sylvester's sequence is 1.
For example, if the domain is the set of all real numbers, one can assert in first-order logic the existence of an additive inverse of each real number by writing ∀x ∃y (x + y = 0) but one needs second-order logic to assert the least-upper-bound property for sets of real numbers, which states that every bounded, nonempty set of real numbers ...
The square root of x is a partial inverse to f(x) = x 2. Even if a function f is not one-to-one, it may be possible to define a partial inverse of f by restricting the domain. For example, the function = is not one-to-one, since x 2 = (−x) 2.