Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Counterman v. Colorado, 600 U.S. 66 (2023), is a case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the line between true threats of violence punishable as crimes and free speech protected by the First Amendment. The states and lower courts were divided over how to define the line.
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 584 U.S. 617 (2018), was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States that addressed whether owners of public accommodations can refuse certain services based on the First Amendment claims of free speech and free exercise of religion, and therefore be granted an exemption from laws ensuring non-discrimination in public ...
The location of the State of Colorado in the United States of America See also: List of municipalities in Colorado The following table lists the adjectival and demonymic forms of cities and towns in the U.S. State of Colorado .
The case is Nonhuman Rights Project Inc v Cheyenne Mountain Zoological Society et al, Colorado Supreme Court, No. 24SA21. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler and ...
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC, 518 U.S. 604 (1996), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Colorado Republican Party challenged the Federal Election Commission (FEC) as to whether the "Party Expenditure Provision" of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA) violated the First Amendment right to free speech.
In October, the Colorado Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the same baker, who a lower court had found violated a state anti-discrimination law by refusing to make a cake celebrating a ...
After the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that former President Donald Trump is ineligible for office because of the Constitution’s “insurrectionist ban,” some prominent Republicans bashed the ...
Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision regarding the First Amendment.The Court ruled 6–3 that the right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility.